A Comprehensive Resource on Social Capital and Its Research. Introduction Definition Literature Conceptualisation Conclusions Further Research References Theory Dimensions Levels Types Determinants Benefits Downsides Conceptualisation Problems Approaches
Operationalisation Measurement Building
Evolution Contemporary Authors Capital Debate Gender Issues NRM Summary
In the literature, social capital is generally conceptualized gender-blind, paying little attention to gendered intra-household issues of power and hierarchy.


Gender Issues in Social Capital

One area social capital literature is weak on is gender (Kilby 2002). Ethnic and gender dimensions of social capital remain under-recognized (Fox and Gershman 2000; Molinas 1998). In the literature, social capital is generally conceptualized gender-blind, paying little attention to gendered intra-household issues of power and hierarchy (Norton 2001; Silvey and Elmhirst 2003). Silvey and Elmhirst (2003) argued that for a more complete picture of social capital, specifically one that includes attention to the gendered and intergenerational conflicts and hierarchies within social networks, and the broader context of gender difference within which social networks are forged. The authors also posited that social capital that exists within a broader context of gender inequality can exacerbate women's disadvantages, as women remain excluded from the more powerful networks of trust and reciprocity that exist among men (Silvey and Elmhirst 2003).




View Comment Policy

Enter comments about this article

Your Name:
Your Comment:
Enter the code above:     
Please note: comments will not appear on this page until they have been approved. Comments containing links to other websites will only be approved if the link is directly relevant to the content of this page.




Comments about this article

There are no comments about this article as yet. Be the first to comment now.